You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #14: Plausible Deniability [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-12-05 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. Plausible Deniability
Here they go again. Remember when O'Reilly said he'd never forgive this regime if it was proven there weren't WMDs...then conveniently ignored it when the spin turned to going after the "terrorists" our invasion had created. A zero-sum game the right wing media constantly plays to give them cover if someone dares to expose their hypocrisies.

The fun here is I don't think many of the wing nut spinners know what to make of DeLay's mess. They know it's bad, they know it's real and they know they can't hide it much longer. But they also know this guy is a "god" to their coven of listeners and the big money donors. Pissing off this guy is like pissing off Don Corleone (or Sonny may be a better comparison)...they have long grown to fear this weasel that unless they see him dead with a silver spike through the heart, they will fear his influence and power. An interesting spot to be in indeed.

Looks like O'Reilly has been chosen to play "good cop" on this sham network...and ironically, it does make Faux look more balanced compared to its rivals. During the Schaivo circus, O'Reilly was one of the few voices that favored removing the tube and that looked almost "left wing" in comparison with the coverage on the other networks. Sure, no sooner was O'Reilly gone than there's Hannity doing a trailer-trash rally at the Hospice, but for that 60 minutes Faux actually looks "balanced", and gives Repugnicans and the network cover in being so shrill and over-the-top...not to mention highly innacurate the rest of the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC