You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #119: Why did he have to make a concession speech at lightening speed [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
cidliz2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-14-05 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #99
119. Why did he have to make a concession speech at lightening speed
timing. He didn't wait at all. He seemed like he couldn't wait to proclaim a Bush victory. The votes were not all counted AND there was no real chance for claims of problems with the voting system that had just BARELY taken place. He had the world stage to focus attention on any allegations of inpropriaty with the voting practices, but, he bascially shut it down and walked away before the problems could really surface. Be in denial all that you want but at least Gore fought some before he conceded. Kerry knew 4 years ahead of time what had happened to Gore, Kerry knew what the hotly contested states would be, Kerry knew on election day which states were slam dunks for Bush and which states were slam dunks for Kerry. Kerry knew that Ohio was razor thin close and he gave the process NO TIME to expose or to allow people to come forward with complaints. Excuse me, but it is EXTREMELY obvious that he had no intentions of fighting for us in this election when it really mattered. Your attitude seems to be - unless you are caught red handed cheating, don't bother investigating and standing your ground when there seems to be discrepancies with the voting process. Sorry, but I want somebody who has better judgement than that.

What is so hard to understand, it was all plainly laid out for him (the very recent history of the Bushco stealing an election when he in fact had lost it) and he did NOTHING except to give up and walk away - handing the election to Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC