You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Conservative Pin-Up Girl [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-05 08:44 AM
Original message
The Conservative Pin-Up Girl
Advertisements [?]


the question is-why is she whorthy of this?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A208-2005Apr19.html?referrer=email

The Conservative Pin-Up Girl

By Howard Kurtz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, April 19, 2005; 7:47 AM

Yes, those are Ann Coulter's legs on the cover of Time magazine (along with the rest of her, but the legs take up half the page).

Why is "Ms. Right," as Time dubs her, worthy of such prominence?......



She was pretty incendiary then, as well as funny, but became more shrill during the Bush administration, churning out books accusing liberals of being treasonous and worse. I always wondered, since Coulter is an obviously intelligent lawyer, whether she was just developing an outlandish shtick that worked from a marketing point of view.

In the fall of 2001, her response to the terrorist attacks was: "We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity." When she wrote that airport security should devote special scrutiny to "suspicious-looking swarthy males," National Review dropped Coulter as a contributing editor, prompting her to call Editor Rich Lowry and his deputies "girly boys."

When USA Today sent Coulter to last year's Democratic convention, she filed a column about "the corn-fed, no make-up, natural fiber, no-bra needing, sandal-wearing, hirsute, somewhat fragrant hippie-chick pie wagons they call 'women' at the Democratic National Convention." When the paper refused to run the column, she quit.

So why exactly is Time profiling her now, other than the chance to feature a woman in a short dress?
.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC