You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #6: Look at the alternative [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-24-05 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Look at the alternative
Will this administration WITHDRAW FROM IRAQ? According to people who have researched the matter the US Army will go into terminal decline to to lack of new recruits sometime in 2006 (Rough Estimate depends on how the fighting continues in Iraq AND if the US expands the War ti include Iran). Thus basically the Army will be done by 2006.

I believe that had The US had the draft at the time of 9/11 Bush could NOT have gone into Iraq (Afghanistan yes, but not Iraq) because the Draft means more people would know someone in the military and thus oppose sending the troops to war. This is the main reason the GOP oppose the raft, a draft makes it harder to send the Troops anywhere Corporate America wants the US to intervene. A draft would complicate such commitments, that a mercenary army (which is what the US has at the present time) does not have to really worry about.

Thus the problem for Bush is come 2006 you will see a situation like Israel had in Lebanon in the 1980s and 1990s. Israel was unwilling to send in Israeli troops (Who tend to be reservists), but with no one enlisting for "Regular" troops service do to the ongoing losses in Lebanon Israel was forced to withdraw. (I know the Israeli Army is not form the same way as the US Army and most of the losses Israel suffered in the Lebanese war was among its allies in South Lebanon. Those allies were formed into the South Lebanese Army which became less and less Christian and more and more hired mercenary Moslem's as the occupation lasted. Even with the Switch to Mercenary Muslims the Israelis could NOT recruit the troops needed to hold Lebanon so Israel Abandoned southern Lebanon).

Back on track, my point is the US Army will "crack" sometime in 2006 do to lack of recruits. The US does not have the option of hiring a local mercenary army to do its work (Like how Israel Recruited the South Lebanon Army). The attempts have been failures except for the Kurds who want to fight for an independent Kurdistan (and thus willing to help the US against their fellow Iraqis but not really willing to fight to keep Iraq whole under US Control). Thus unless the insurgency dies down within the next year (And that is NOT expected) Bush will have to make a choice, pull out of Iraq OR institute the Draft. Bush wants NEITHER, but come 2006 he will have to choose, and I fear he will opt for the Draft rather than pull out of Iraq.

One last comment, I see the draft being first for "Skill" positions, i.e. Medical personal, Computer people, Linguists who generally NOT be in the line of fire (and the Draft will be justified on that ground, i.e. we need these people BUT they will not be fired upon). Once the Skill draft is implemented than a secondary Draft to built back up the Reserves and National Guard "To help the States" (Yes after destroying the Guard, Bush will "save" the Guard with the draft so that the states can have the Guard for Emergencies). It is only after the Draft is imposed to "save" the Guard will the draft be extended to the Regular Army (Through this may take Months instead of years, so watch how it works out).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC