You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #1: Still has legs!!!...They're as long as a giraffe's!!! [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
BJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-03 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. Still has legs!!!...They're as long as a giraffe's!!!
Edited on Wed Sep-17-03 03:00 PM by BJ
Looks like the congressional Dems mean business too! Joe Lieberman's getting involved!
(-snip-)
"...In 1993, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), the body responsible for setting accounting standards in the U.S., attempted to fix stock option accounting. The proposal required stock options to be valued, and that value recorded as an operating expense over the period of time that the options vested. A wide constituency of business interests opposed this. In support of these business interests, Senator Joseph Liebermann (D-Conn.) introduced and obtained support for the “Equity Expansion Act of 1993”. This was the first time that Congress intervened in a purely accounting matter. Lieberman’s act negated the FASB’s proposal for all public companies. In 1994, Lieberman continued the assault with the “Accounting Standards Reform Act of 1994”, which would have required the SEC to review and approve all new accounting standards. The 1994 legislation effectively would have removed the FASB’s authority. In response, the FASB changed its position to the rules that now exist. FASB folded, and said so. According to John Foster, a board member, “We know this isn’t the right answer, but the debate has been so divisive, we need to bring closure to this item.”

Lieberman won, and investors that depend on fair financial statements lost."

(-snip-)
http://www.fulcruminquiry.com/article21.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC