in almost every skirmish since gulf war 1 and before, does it's use in these wars reflect badly on those that support ALL the candidates that had no problem with these other wars, or just Clark?
Is knowing DU was/is being used and still going along with support of the war less of an atrosity than using it yourself while in the war?
While the use of DU is not a great thing, to crucify Clark because the army used it and not the others that have come out in support of every other war besides Iraq #2 is a little biased, isn't it?
I seem to have read that while against this war, "some" of the other candidates had no problem with Iraq #1 or Afghanistan where DU was used as well, should ALL these candidates be shamed as well as their supporters?
Had some of the other candidates been in the war, they too would have had the same chance to use DU and could also be depicted as killers along with Clark.
So who you gonna vote for bunkey?
![](http://www.govsux.com/images/tumbs.gif)
CLARK FOR PRESIDENT
Retyred IN FLA.