You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #21: painful relevance [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Iverson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-28-03 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. painful relevance
The essential problems of unjust laws or predatory treaties do not disappear just because one party is too poor to be effectively exploited further.

Remember: these multilateral agreements do not just apply to Costa Rica. They apply to all signatories. Once you endorse this way of doing things, it applies to those who CAN be disemboweled on the basis of phantom future profits.

So yes, legal pretext is a relevant point here, and painfully so.

And remember, all this assumes that Costa Rica incurs no penalty because they are too poor. That is likely not a safe assumption at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC