Reply #21: One fact that argues for indictments [View All]

[longship]

is that three judges signed off on Miller's imprisonment against their better judgement that it might restrict First Amendment rights. I can't remember the specific wording but one judge even made a statement about the seriousness of this case trumped.

IANAL, but you seem to be arguing that their is a possiblity that there will be no indictments. I would have to agree with you on that. But I would argue that this is not a high probability. I don't have your expertease, but it seems to me that this investigation is heading towards something other than folding up the tables and going home empty handed. They very well may extend the investigation. But with the level of recent activity, Fitz has got to have something cooking.

If not indictments, than what? A never-ending investigation? Oh, the Repugs will just *love* that. And why would a guy like Fitz do that? I see your point, but I do not see why a s.p. would take a path to non-action when it is his job to act. Especially this particular s.p.

Your experience and insight would be helpful here.
And thanks.