You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #12: This is a thoughtful piece you've written and I want to respond to [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-14-05 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. This is a thoughtful piece you've written and I want to respond to
Edited on Fri Oct-14-05 08:12 PM by joemurphy
it in the same vein.

First, your comments on Fundie-bashing are measured and probably accurate. As you say, when non-believers become outraged because a fundamentalist may be attacking their core beliefs, the natural inclination is to respond in kind. Imposition of creationist textbooks in public school systems, homosexuality being attacked as "sin", or Planned Parenthood being pilloried as a Satanic organization tend to inflame those not subscribing to those viewpoints.

That said, I think sometimes that we on the left, despite our paying lipservice to "multiculturalism" are sometimes more tolerant of Buddhism, Hinduism, and even Wicca Paganism than we are of Christian fundamentalism. Fundamentalists aren't going to go quietly back to their churches if they see those churches as under attack.

The problem I see with fundamentalism (and I'd include militant Catholicism here too) is the issue of abortion. It's something that adherents of certain fundamentalist religions simply can't countenance or tolerate. I can understand that viewpoint and maybe even respect it as a deeply held and genuine moral belief. The problem is -- how can you square that with the equally sincere and deeply held beliefs of those who do not view a fertilized embryo in its initial stages of existence and unviable outside the mother's womb as worthy of protection when the mother incubating it does not want to bring it to term?

My point is that abortion is the driving force making for the present gap between the Christian right and the Democratic left. It never goes away. Until science and human behavior finds a better way of curbing unwanted pregnancies, I guess I just don't see any answers to the present impasse between Christian evangelicals and Pro-Choice adherents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC