You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #41: That's not true [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-20-05 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #35
41. That's not true
There is a difference between attentive parents whose children wander off, and this woman. She was right there. She took the child back to his father. Then, she let the kid throw rocks and sticks into a creek she had already decided was too dangerous for him to be around. That changes the legal responsibility of the situation. Parents are charged in situations like this all the time, when it isn't a matter of having taken all reasonable precautions and the child getting into mischief in spite of it. This woman didn't take those reasonable precautions, she ignored her own best judgment in fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC