Reply #336: what gall you have...who are you to lecture me about anything? [View All]

[noiretextatique]

'liberal attitudes' had nothing to do with my process of coming out...accepting myself did. i know what it's like to come out, and i know why it's a lot more accepable to do so now...it has nothing to do with 'liberal largese' and everthing to with gay activists, like the ones at stonewall. and people like harry hays, del martin, phyllis lyons...and barney franks. i am perfectly comfortable with my ethics...and i don't think i need to be in the prone position just to satisfy someone's notion of how ethical so-called 'liberals' are when it comes to protecting the rights of closeted homophobes.
i hate that i have to inform you of this, but being gay is about more than just SEX. this issue here in california is about the rights of gays and lesbians to adopt...drier and his "ilk" are attempting to turn back THAT progress...because THEY can't focus on anything but the SEX. and of course, it is an issue that directly affects me...since my partner wants to adopt a child. there is nothing "noble" about protecting a homophobic asshole's "right" to stay in the closet, while he screws over other gays and lesbians...there is nothing "liberal" or "ethical" about that position either. IF this man is gay, i pray that he is revealed as the hypocrite he is...call it "divine justice." and :wtf: how do you know WHAT "the majority of liberals" think? speak for yourself, please.