Reply #16: I think the bottom line is that you have two parties -- [View All]

[AP]

the public/consumers/income earners on the one hand, and sellers, employers, finacial corporation on the other. One party has something that the other party wants ($$$), and you desperately need a referee to govern the playing field. Most commerce is very good, some is a complete waste of money. Sometimes the government leans a little farther in serving the interests of the wealth takers rather than the wealth creators, and that's not good. But I don't see how anybody could believe that not having any referee would work better than having even a biased referee. At least when you have this position of 'referee' who can work towards getting better referees. Without any referee, you have no recourse except armed rebellion.