You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #18: That's essentially what Nevada's got, too [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Nevernose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-03 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. That's essentially what Nevada's got, too
For pot under an ounce, it's a $50 fine, but after the third offense, it becomes a class "E" felony (the mandatory puinishment for a class E is one year's probation, so really a class E doesn't do anything except fuck up all possiblity of ever getting a good job). I was a pretty heavy pot-smoker for years, and never got busted for anything drug-related, so I think that's pretty fair. A fine for under an ounce might be just enough motivation to keep it on the down low, if you see what I mean. Even cultivation in this state is usually plea-bargained pretty lowly, so long as the defendant doesn't have a string of felonious behavior.

Also speaking from a Nevadan's standpoint, at least in Las Vegas, harder drugs are decriminalized. First and sometimes second offenses of possession of harder drugs are punished with drug court. Daily therapy, weekly random UA's, bi-weekly mettings with the judge -- Las Vegas was one of the five pilot cities for the drug-court program, and it has a much higher recovery rate than most poor addicts can achieve alone. Sometimes, even other crimes can be taken to drug court if they were committed to feed a drug habit (e.g., Las Vegas is the forgery capital of the world). Meth, crack, sherm, and heroin fuck up way more than the user -- they fuck up families and communities, and it would be totally irresopnsible to allow them free reign.

For the record, matijuana possession by a minor is usually treated much more seriously than possession by adults.

What we NEED to figure out is how to better control alcohol and alcohol-related crime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC