http://www4.fosters.com/election_2002/oct/09/us_2cong_1009a.aspYou see people. The afore provided link is what happens when "reporter" try to interpret what someone says and they pick and choose what they report. From another article on the topic issued on the same day we get (I've been saving this one for a rainy day :evilgrin:)
snip...
He said if she were in Congress this week, he would advise her to vote for the resolution,
but only after vigorous debate. The resolution is expected to pass the House overwhelmingly. Swett has said she supports it, as does her opponent, incumbent U.S. Rep. Charles Bass.
The general said he had no doubt Iraq posed a threat, but questioned whether it was immediate and said the debate about a response has been conducted backward.
"Normally in a debate, you start with a problem and consider possible solutions. Instead, the president has presented us with a solution before the problem has been fully articulated," he said.
"As far as the information we have now shows, there are no nuclear warheads on missiles pointed to America," he said. "You can’t wait 10 years to act, but there is time on our side."
He said al-Qaida remains the largest terrorist threat against the United States, and the connection between al-Qaida and Iraq is unclear.