You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #130: But Seriously, Will, why did Dept of Homeland Security award 90mil to MS [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-12-03 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
130. But Seriously, Will, why did Dept of Homeland Security award 90mil to MS
Edited on Sun Oct-12-03 11:16 AM by emulatorloo
When their software is "riddled with vulnerabilities" and there are more secure alternatives like Linux and Mac OS X (Unix based) approved by the federal govt?

When you finish your other work, I think this is worth looking into in your "spare time"

Best Regards

____________________________________________________
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=11249

Microsoft software "riddled with vulnerabilities", trade body claims

Dept of Homeland Security should avoid Microsoft

INQUIRER staff: Thursday 28 August 2003, 16:02

THE US Computer and Communications Industry Association (CCIA) has urged the US Department of Homeland Security to avoid using Microsoft software.

The Washington based association, which represents members that generate over $200 billion, has issued an open letter to Tom Ridge, Secretary of the department, urging him to review his decision to choose Microsoft for its desktops and servers.

It claims that last week's events relating to the Blaster and SoBig worms, have highlighted problems in cybersecurity.

The letter, from Ed Black, the association's president, said:"We believe that for software to be truly secure it must be well written from the outset with security considerations given a high priority".

It accuses Microsoft of being more interested in economic marketing and competition than security and said the lack of diversity within a network system "amplifies the risk emanating from any vulnerabilities that do exist".

It continues: "Our preliminary findings indicate the severity of the security problems relating to some Microsoft software".

The Blaster worm, it said, crashed the Navy Marine intranet*, the CSX railway system, Maryland's Dept of Motor Vehicles, Air Canada systems, and most seriously earlier this year a nuclear power plant was downed by Slammer.

Microsoft, it claims, isn't guiltless, because it is continuing to "create software riddled with obvious and easily exploited vulnerabilities". µ


* A SMALL correction here. The worm caused an intrusion, rather than a crash, on this particular network.

___________________________________________

Onedit, edit heading for spelling and grammar and add a sentence for clarification.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC