You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #83: so why not get rid of them? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
imenja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-05 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #79
83. so why not get rid of them?
From my perspective (an American with an Irish grandmother who didn't look kindly on the British, especially their monarchy), it's a colossal waste or money. They say it attracts tourism. I went to Britain but certainly didn't go because of the monarchy. I guess some here are interested in their soap opera lives. We have ridiculous TV programs here that periodically focus on it. I never watch them. To me, they rank even below Michael Jackson in my level of interest. The royal family doesn't make you guys look good. It highlights absurd social conventions that seem to no longer have meaning anyway, even there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC