You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #7: That's absolutely NOT what I said. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-02-05 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. That's absolutely NOT what I said.
Yes, I believe that SOME intrusion is O.K. ("intrusion" is how they catch bad guys). Whether you agree with drug laws or not, they exist. I think it's great that at least they're being applied to a celebrity this time.

By living in a society we agree to cede some of our personal rights to the whole. If you don't agree with laws, you can work to change them but it's not O.K. to simply ignore them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC