You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #10: Trekkie to non-Trekkie: [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
ElboRuum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-01-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
10. Trekkie to non-Trekkie:
The Enterprise ran on two types of power, one for faster than light travel (warp drive) and another for sub-light travel (impulse drive). While the specifics of impulse drive are not often discussed in the show, warp drive involves utilizing dilithium crystals and sufficient energy, through matter-antimatter annihilation, to open up a passage into subspace, where the 186,282 mi/s light speed limit does not exist. Dilithium crystals, as it turns out, look in the three-dimensional world like ordinary quartz. However dilithium is different in that its crystal lattice extends into subspace. When enough energy is channeled through the crystals, a subspace warp field is created, shaped by the warp nacelles (those pylons on the back of the ship) to push it along in subspace at what appear in normal space as faster-than-light velocities, only without those nasty relativistic time-dilation effects.

Now, that's pretty advanced technology. However, the power delivery system within the ship would be poorly served by warp fields, wouldn't it? A warp field powered hair dryer? No, it is likely that the energy used to power the ships internal systems are far more geared to life in normal space. While no mention is made of it, the delivery of useful energy around the ship and into portable devices is probably still electricity (or something electromagnetic), converted from some of the energy generated in the matter-antimatter reactor, while the delivery of data seems to be photonic (light), such as fiber optic cables. Computation seems to be of the quantum variety, and data storage capacities are measured in exabytes (XB). Regardless of the technology, electrical power makes sense for all of these systems.

True, the box on the wall was rinky-dink, and while I'm sure they could have been a bit more stylish, the send button makes perfect sense, while I admit something voice activated, or will activated, might be more futuristic, you still don't want to be in an always-on mode where anyone can hear every word or thought you have.

Bear in mind that this intercom system may be more advanced than you realize. Did you ever notice how these intercoms are everywhere, yet whenever they are used, the intercom system only delivers the connection to the one closest the the target of the communication? So, clearly the intercom system is tied into the internal personnel tracking system in some way. Note that whoever is initiating the contact only has to speak the name of the person to get this delivery system to work (no P/A, no paging system)?

Now that I've fully geeked out, I need to go lie down. Please refrain from asking any more Trek questions today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC