You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #12: UNSCOM Inspections Did Not End Successfully [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU
DrFunkenstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-03 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. UNSCOM Inspections Did Not End Successfully
Saddam Hussein had repeatedly jerked UNSCOM around, playing games with off-limit "presidential" and "sensitive" zones, with Iraqi observers, and with stripped down production sites. In September 1997, Iraqis were caught running away from a supposed food-testing lab with biological test equipment and incriminating documents. Later that month, Iraqi guards held inspectors at gunpoint in a tense episode that ended with the inspectors withdrawal.

In June of 1998, UNSCOM excavated weaponized VX nerve gas in destroyed warheads. A single drop of VX can kill within an hour. Iraq had vehemently denied their existence until that point. In the following months, the inspections process collapsed altogether, ending with evacuation before Operation Desert Fox.

UNSCOM did not end with any guarantees of Iraq's disarmament, and instead documented their desire to continue producing WMDs. No inspectors were allowed in for four years, and that was one month AFTER the IWR vote.

Saddam Hussein had a twenty-five year history as a violently loose cannon with a history of using chemical weapons on a grand scale and a desire to acquire the ability for a nuclear program. After 9/11, we could not afford to let such people play the dangerous games that Saddam had enjoyed in the 90's.

The containment policy you suggest was, in my opinion, unacceptable. While Kucinich has consistently maintained this position, even Howard Dean eventually understood that an active inspection process, backed by the real threat of force, was a necessity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Politics/Campaigns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC