Reply #5: That was funny! [View All]

[The Traveler]

:rofl:

But here's the problem ... scientists work and think a way fundamentally different from lawyers or politicians. Science is always refining the body of work, probing for iconsistencies, constructing alternate models. Just because a scientist is applying critical analysis to one aspect of the body of work does not mean that scientist has rejected the entire proposition. Thus I might throw rocks at your model for (as an example) arctic ice melting but that does not mean I reject the notion that human activity has triggered climate change processes.