Reply #14: Still thick as a brick, eh? [View All]

[kristopher]

Yes, I looked at the list. Tester has published nearly 200 articles and is affiliated with some pretty impressive institutions. I'd say that citing his work is a little more concrete than your monotonous accusation that all things that contradict your extremely uninformed worldview are just pulled out of someone's ass.

As for passing someone else's work off as my own, that is purely your imagination. The first post of the thread gave the origin of the NREL document AND it is clearly spelled out at the end of the reposted portion:

The Environmental and Energy Study Institute is a non-profit organization established in 1984 by a bipartisan,
bicameral group of members of Congress to provide timely information on energy and environmental policy issues to
policymakers and stakeholders and develop innovative policy solutions that set us on a cleaner, more secure and
sustainable energy path.

It is clear that you have no basis for your hyperbolic rantings so you descend into argumentation that even McCain would be ashamed of using.

The fact is that WE DON"T NEED NUCLEAR ENERGY TO REPLACE FOSSIL FUELS. It is amazing that you feel such a strong compulsion to disparage the technologies and resources that make it unnecessary to expose ourselves to the undeniable risks associated with nuclear. Really, it's absolutely amazing; it is a mindset that rivals the worst self delusion the Bushies ever produced.