You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #55: We covered this specious idea in another thread sometime ago. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-04-05 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #43
55. We covered this specious idea in another thread sometime ago.
First of all this statement "As for nuclear plants, the hazards include the potential for nuclear melt-downs and wide-spread radiation poisoning of citizens, the contamination of regions surrounding nuclear plants for hundreds, thousands or even tens of thousands of years, the difficulty of safely storing lethal waste materials that have half lives measured in tens of thousands of years (how many civilizations do you know that have lasted even 1,000 years?) and the creation of attractive targets for terrorists, to name only a few. In fact, nuclear plants have been called "weapons of mass destruction pre-positioned on American soil."" is just patent nonsense. The statement is simply ignorance and fear and is, well, pure bullshit.

No one in the United States has died from the use of commercial nuclear power. If I'm wrong, prove it. I have a whole thread here http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=115&topic_id=5609&mesg_id=5609 discussing so called "nuclear waste" in detail. In it I examine with pretty pointed technical detail that the fear of so called "nuclear waste," is complete nonsense perpetrated by people who don't think and who in fact don't even have a basic clue.

The plant under discussion, the solar tower, is a plant covering almost 20 square kilometers to generate just 200 Megawatts. Just on these grounds alone, it is extremely doubtful that this technology is either economical or environmentally benign.

Part of the proposal includes building structures taller than those now existing anywhere on earth. Further there is a lot of hand waving about construction costs and every single one of the assertions here is unproven and untested..

Not one such plant functions anywhere on earth. When an operating pilot exists, maybe we can discuss such schemes and examine their economics and environmental acceptability. But this is not a time to be cute or play games. Our planet is in very dire immediate circumstances. Tiny, and I do mean tiny 200 Megawatt solar stations are not going to save the world. The emergency isn't something that's happening fifty years from now when we've ironed out how to play with our erector sets. The emergency is NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC