You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #2: part of it must be an artifact of reporting [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
amazona Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. part of it must be an artifact of reporting
If I had known that anyone was collecting beak deformity data, I could have filed a report this summer. I can promise you that there are a lot more beak deformities in the Lower 48 than 12 birds but if you don't know of anyone collecting the data, why would you document it?

Most overgrowth of beaks I've seen has been caused by mites. It can be treated but it's probably problematical to do so in wild birds.

Me, I'd test for mites first, but assuming this is the first thing they would have thought of, I'll just keep my fingers crossed that it is less unusual than they fear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC