Maurkov
(126 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-22-04 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #44 |
48. I disagree with the analysis |
|
Hubbert curves are real, however, looking at their behavior in the US and in Venezuela does not help us predict their behavior in Saudi Arabia and Iraq. Why? Because when the US and Venezuela reached their peaks, there was still an ocean of oil over there. Our depleted reserves didn't affect the global price of oil. When SA and Iraq reach their peak, the price of oil will rise.
The definition of "reserves" is hinged on the market price. As the price goes up, the amount in reserves goes up. Oil that could not be extracted at a profit now can be. To be flippant, we will never run out of oil; we just won't be able to afford it anymore. What that means is that applications that require oil will be able to get it. Applications where there is a cheaper substitute will use the cheaper substitute.
One problem is net energy. At some point, it requires more energy to extract the oil than can be reclaimed from it. Oil becomes an energy sink. Again, applications that require oil are going to be able to get it, but only by injecting more energy from other sources into the system.
That segues into the next problem: Where will this other energy come from? This is where environmentalists (and I count myself as one of them) need to make some hard choices. Which alternative energy sources have the least downsides? Cases can be made for and against all of them, but when we're talking about an alternative to shedding 90% of the human population, I think we can make some sacrifices. Nuclear power will probably fill in everywhere that wind, hydro, and solar can't meet the need. Biodiesel will be used where energy density is important (like transportation).
This will not be painless. There will be environmental degredation as we exploit every available energy source. Energy is an input into everything, so increasing energy prices will trigger widespread inflation. But then high energy prices will encourage conservation better than a month of Earthdays. It's regressive, but it will work where nothing else has. Most people will suffer a loss in their standard of living. Most people will not die off.
|