You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #88: okay [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-05-04 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #82
88. okay
It's not the guns themselves you should be concerned with. It's the "nut behind the wheel" - Improperly trained, stupid, or evil people with guns.

It's just that if we write it this way:

Improperly trained, stupid or evil people

-- leaving off the "with guns" -- one doesn't have to be nearly as concerned about them. The evil ones, maybe. The improperly trained and stupid ones, just not at all.

Take the firearm out of the equation and out of their hands, and an "improperly trained" person, in the identical situation, is harmless. The stupid person is virtually harmless, unless s/he manages to knock a bookshelf over on your head or something. (Here speaketh the person who pulled a bookshelf over onto her head, and was left having to try to assure the handsome young ER doctor that "bookshelf" was not a euphemism for "abusive spouse".)

So as far as I can tell, what we'd need to be concerned about would be a fraction of what we now need to be concerned about, if the people in question didn't have ready access to firearms.

There will always be moronic 18 year olds who'd be happy to sit around and drink beer and play with guns. And some of them will always have idiotic grandfathers who give them the guns to play with. And other people will have small children who will be eager to play with their parents' firearms, and so on and on.

But if the people with the firearms could not legally take possession of the firearms without first having a firearms licence, and if they had to successfully take the appropriate training course before they could get that licence, and if their ownership of the firearm were registered and the law required that when not in legitimate use it be stored unloaded and separately from ammunition ... well, a few lives might be saved, at no cost worth mentioning, to anyone.

(I mean, hey, I've got a computer program for that "registration" angle that you can have, cheap. Ha ha, a Liberal Party boondoggle joke. Have you heard the one that's playing out in Parliament this season, all about how the Liberals paid millions and millions of dollars to some of their cronies in Quebec for doing nothing at all? If you ever have a few mil to spare, the Liberals can always put it to good use.)

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC