You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #10: Response to response [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU
Character Assassin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Response to response
It may have escaped your notice, but suicide bombings are not the only violent attacks on Israel and its citizens. There are frequent hit-and-run guerilla attacks wherein no one tries to blow themselves up.

Most of these raids are 100 percent legal, since they target soldiers, not civilians.


100% 'legal'? On what basis? And can you support the contention that 'most' target soldiers, not civilians?

There's no question that Syria assists numerous Palestinian terrorist groups. But Israel engages in activity that's been described by Kofi Annan as "state terrorism", and sponsors terrorists like the SLA.


I place no value in opinions or statements of Kofi Annan.

Hezbollah was the wrong group to single out. While I have political and ideological disagreements with Hezbollah, they aren't a terrorist group -- they don't target civilians as a policy.


If you think Hezbollah is not a terrorist group, we really have nothing further to discuss.

Then you ask, "We did? Were those American planes? American pilots?" No. Fisk is trying to make that case that America's threatening of Syria effectively gave the green light for Israel to attack Syria.


They would have done so in any case. I see no evidence that they get their marching orders, so to speak, from Washington D.C.

You then write that "Israel plays to win, and has won each time Syria has attacked it." But Syria has never attacked Israel.


That is a matter of opinion and definition. Suffice it to say "when conflict between Israel and Syria ensued" if it makes you feel any better.

Israel did not exist in 1948. Therefore, Syria did not attack Israel. Syria was merely acting to secure the areas allocated for the Palestinian state.


A distinction without a difference.

Israel attacked Syria in 1967.


When one strikes out at a man pointing a gun to one's head, the terminology becomes irrelevant.

Syria did not attack Israel in 1973. It attacked Israeli forces in the Occupied Territories.


A distinction without a difference.

Israel continued attacking Syria even after a ceasefire had been declared.


Irrelevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC