You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #30: These articles do not dispute MEMRI's accuracy [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine

Dick Dastardly

(741 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed May-14-08 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #28

30. These articles do not dispute MEMRI's accuracy

On this link it says

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/aug/12/worlddispatch.brianwhitaker

"Nobody, so far as I know, disputes the general accuracy of Memri's translations but there are other reasons to be concerned about its output."

So it doesnt claim the translations are inaccurate

This is the standard article that is used to try to dispute MEMRI but it does nothing of the sort and says it is accurate. It is all baseless spin. It also had to print a correction at the end of the article for a false claim it made.

This article only says there is a dispute about one of the translations

http://mediamatters.org/items/200601200010

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Israel/Palestine

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.