Reply #10: In reply to #8 [View All]

[noise]

Much of the information relating to Rschop's post is still classified. For example, on the NARA 9/11 site, MFR's with FBI and CIA agents involved in al-Hazmi/al-Mihdhar issues are pending classification review. One should note the 9/11 Commission turned their records over to NARA in 2004. The Commissioners met and agreed that 1/09 was a good release date for some of the records. The pending classification review records are awaiting intelligence agency review. It is 2010 and we still can't get explanations to government conduct in the lead up to 9/11.

A federal appeals court in Manhattan last year dismissed claims against the Saudi government, saying such litigation can proceed only if the State Department finds that the Saudis provided financial aid and other assistance to terrorist groups.

Specter looks to revive 9/11 suits against Saudis

Specter and Bob Graham have both stated that it has been proven that Saudis supported al Qaeda. Scheuer stated that before 9/11 the Saudis protected Bin Laden (on a Book TV interview with Steve Coll).

Aren't these the type of official sources you trust? Senators? The first chief of Alec Station?

I know this has nothing to do with inside job. It has to do with cover-up. Secrecy. Concealing information from the public. We have government officials advocating for doing away with Miranda rights. Yet these very same officials have not told the public what happened before 9/11. What was the Saudi involvement in al Qaeda? Why did they go along with the invasion of Iraq when Saudi Arabia had closer links to al Qaeda?

We still don't have answers in 2010. Instead we were told "we need to move on for the good of the country." That is absurd.