You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #10: Are you saying... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-10-05 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Are you saying...
that just disagreeing with any aspect of any CT is disruptive? There are some of us that believe that unquestioning belief in the (shall we say) "more creative" theories concerning 9/11 can be used by the far right to discredit all questions concerning 9/11. In my posts in this thread I was simply questioning the wide spread belief that the heat generated by the WTC fires was not hot enough to weaken the steel supports and eventually lead to the collapse of the towers. For presenting hard fact I am a "disrupter"? Why doesn't someone present some alternate facts instead of personally attacking me? This is a discussion board is it not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » September 11 Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC