hack89
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-10-05 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
that just disagreeing with any aspect of any CT is disruptive? There are some of us that believe that unquestioning belief in the (shall we say) "more creative" theories concerning 9/11 can be used by the far right to discredit all questions concerning 9/11. In my posts in this thread I was simply questioning the wide spread belief that the heat generated by the WTC fires was not hot enough to weaken the steel supports and eventually lead to the collapse of the towers. For presenting hard fact I am a "disrupter"? Why doesn't someone present some alternate facts instead of personally attacking me? This is a discussion board is it not?
|