Reply #32: Before Math; Examine all factors, Seek Order [View All]

[Christophera]

Of course its a challenge to see if such a collision consistent with damage done can occur as defined by physics.

I think we know the calculations can't be produced. To produce an understanding I advocate a ordered summary to evaluate cause/effect in the collision process.

A plane; mostly air with fuel and cargo, having only 2 large hard projectile elements, engines; hits at say 400 plus in level flight but somwhat oblique, 27 degrees off perpindicular.

A building, recently hardfaced with anti ballistic shielding. Unreinforced concrete panel walls and masonry facing are underneath. Heavy steel reinforced columns holding up beams of the same stand in the subfloor areas.

Collision; The planes nose and right wing tip connect tearing off pieces the plane enters just below the first floor. The soft nose mushroms to the side and slides a tiny bit down the face of the building. All components in motion share the same vector into vertical walls and floors. Soft aluminum forms around the floor but break big chunks off plowing them in front or throwing them off. Fuel is vaporized and catches fire. The heavy titanium and hardened steel engines with components turning at high RPM drag engine mounts and shreds of wings into the building. The panels of concrete hit with soft forming metals collapse, fall. The soft metals form and roll into, over and through the collapsing elements of structure.
The engines begin tumbling out front of the slowing fuselage, reacting to the line of travel and impact vector with each fresh impact, spinning and bouncing through sub floor areas.

If they hit a non steel reinforced wall at the end of that kind of travel, only beams columns and floors were steel reinforced, they might penetrate, but would leave irregular holes at their reduced speeds as they deflected more with the impact vector in slowing.

All of the above is contradictory to the damage to the face and the exit hole left in the building which has a very unform ballistic quality, and there is only one hole.

In all we see the soft aluminum plane making a large hole because it does not penetrate, it spread out and knocks things down. Shallow penetration over a wide area, except for the engines.

A supersonic missile with a hardened airframe would do almost exactly what we saw. Others define a small plane launching a missile from the parking lot video. Since a missile with a charge in it blowing up causing the explosion seen in the video would be destroyed before reaching the wall where the exit hole is, the explosion was caused by stationary charges placed near a fuel tank/storage area on the ground level of the pentagon set off with a vibration detector on the face of the wall.

The sound barrier was broken that morning and witnessed by an entire school yard and many residents.

Conclusion; (NOTE: Pictures show guys in suits carrying an obect on a wooden pallet covered with a blue tarp.)

A bunker buster AND hardface anti ballistic building applique was tested in a giant ruse along with a bunch of mkultra pentagon witnesses to add a military target to 9-11 and more justification to make war.

SOON TO BE RELEASED ON VIDEO! (We do hope those citigo and sheraton tapes leak)