Reply #11: Simple [View All]

[John Doe II]

I can prove that the it is very questionable if Abdulaziz Al Omari ever existed. Of course nobody can prove the non-existence of something or someone.
As you questioned correctly in another thread who is supposed to show proofs?
Normally we would expect the government to present proofs for their believe that the 19 alleged hijackers were aboard. But not a single proof has been shown today although it was offically promised by Powell. But most people give about the normal standard procedure of a trial simplpe not a F*** if it comes to 911.
With this thread I want to make clear for everybody that at least in one case there is an absolute necessity to present a proof for the existence of Abdulaziz Al Omari. And I'm really curious if the OTC crowd manages to come up with just a single. I think this is really not too much asked for. I can even sor Al Suqami come up with at least two proofs that the guy (whoever he really was) physically exist(ed).
And if nobody can come up with anything we should face the fact that Abdulaziz never existed and that he was made up. Which of course is a clear blow to the official story.
So, I presented plenty of evidences why it is questionable if this guy ever existed.
I'm very eager to see just a single proof of his existence.