You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #11: Sounds like you may be in agreement with the rethugs, AP. [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

flpoljunkie

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Mar-16-05 06:25 PM
Response to Original message

11. Sounds like you may be in agreement with the rethugs, AP.

ANWR will not solve our dependence on foreign oil. If the Democrats cannot frame this issue, they deserve to lose. OIl from ANWR will not be available until 2025 and it will reduce our dependence on foreign by a whopping 3%--from 68% to 65%--and that is a best case scenario.

Depending on the kindness of Saudi sheiks and OPEC is not an energy policy. It is suicide.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.