You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rep. Conyers on Class Action [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
paineinthearse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-05 01:40 PM
Original message
Rep. Conyers on Class Action
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Mon Mar-21-05 01:47 PM by paineinthearse
Rep Conyers spoke eloquently last night on this same topic. I will apend his House speech later.

This transcript is printed in full, as its souce is Rep. Conyers new political website -
http://www.johnconyers.com/index.asp?Type=NONE&SEC={456ECCD5-4EAC-4C6D-8A17-89728B250AE2}

Op-Ed from Congressman Conyers Regarding Class Action
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Metrotimes.com - Visiting View - 3/9/05

A classless action

By Rep. John Conyers, Jr.

To listen to the bill’s supporters, the class action bill that recently was passed and signed into law is a mere procedural fix designed to prevent national class actions from being heard in state courts. The truth is the Republican bill will notonly federalize nearly all state class actions, it is loaded with special interest goodies that will help corporate wrongdoers and stop civil rights, labor and dangerous-drug cases dead in their tracks. That is why it was opposed by bothstate and federal judiciaries, consumer and public interest groups, environmentaland health organizations, and civil rights and labor groups.

This Republican Party assault on victims and consumers is unprecedented in its scope and stunning in its breadth. Collectively, these measures will close the courthouse doors on millions of Americans harmed by intentional wrongdoing, negligence and fraud, and fighting to keep their families out of financial hot water. Long after the 109th Congress is forgotten, American consumers and workers will be paying the price for these special interest bills through needless injuries and uncompensated harm. First and foremost, the class action legislation will remove class actions involving state law issues from state courts -the forum most convenient for victims of wrongdoing and with the judges most familiar with the substantive law - to the federal courts, where the case will take much longer to be resolved and is muchless likely to be accepted.

You don’t have to take my word for it, just ask big business. The nation’slargest bank, Citicorp, admits “the practical effect may be that many cases will never be heard. Federal judges, facing overburdened dockets and ambiguities about applying state laws in a federal court, often refuse to grant standing to class action plaintiffs.” Forbes magazinewrites, “the legislation will . . . make it more difficult for plaintiffs to prevail, since . . . federal courts are . . . less open to considering . . . class action claims.”

Passage of this legislation is likely to be particularly devastating for civil rights and labor cases. As the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights under the Law explained prior to its passage, “the consequences of the for class actions . . . would be astounding and, in our view, disastrous. Redirecting state law class actions to the federal courts will choke federal court dockets and delay or foreclose the timely and effective determination of federal cases.”

The legislation is equally harmful to workers with wage and hour claims. Often, dozens of employees bring one lawsuit together in state courts, where state wage and hour laws typically provide more complete remedies for victims of such violations than the federal statute. For example, the federal Fair Labor Standards Act offers no protection for a worker who worked 30 hours and is paid for 20, but many states have laws requiring the worker to get paid for the full extent of his orher work. Under the class action bill, these cases will be moved to federal Court where they face likely death and certain delay.

Since the November election, we have heard a lot of talk about “values.” But, someone tell me, where is the value in cutting off access to the courts for senior citizens who suffered heart attacks because they took Vioxx for their arthritis? Where is the morality in preventing poor workers from joining together to obtain compensation when unscrupulous employers pay them slave wages? Where isthe righteousness in telling victims of discrimination that they will have to wait years for a federal court to consider violations of their own state laws?

Our citizens need more protections against such wrongdoers, not less. Unfortunately, the Republican assault on our civil justice system takes us inprecisely the wrong direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC