You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is there something in the water of Alton, IL? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-01-05 01:20 PM
Original message
Is there something in the water of Alton, IL?
Advertisements [?]
One of the most bigoted and ignorant letter that I have read... and in the Wall Street Journal, that normally does not hold these opinions, even grants benefits to same sex partners...



Institution of Marriage
April 1, 2005; Page A11

Rev. Brad Wishon ("Who Are We Harming1," Letters to the Editor, March 15) challenges Robert F. Nagel ("Supreme Chaos2," editorial page, March 7) "to name one harmful consequence resulting from" gay marriage. I think I can name three.

First, I assume that gay married couples get some financial benefits in terms of income taxes, survivors' benefits, etc., just like man-woman married couples. Whoever is paying it is harmed by gay marriage.

Secondly, I assume gay married couples will have increased rights in adopting children. Since it is already difficult for man-woman couples to adopt, gay marriage will make it even harder. Those man-woman couples who are not able to adopt, or who must spend more time and money doing so, are harmed by gay marriage.

One might also wonder what effect it would have on mothers who are considering putting their babies up for adoption. How would knowing that your son could be adopted by two gay men affect your decision? I'm not sure what, if any, harm would be done, but I'd guess it would affect behavior.

Thirdly, and probably most importantly, gay marriage redefines the institution of marriage. As the meaning of marriage is expanded, it is also diluted. Just like awarding first-place gold medals to all Olympic athletes or giving perfect SAT scores to all college applicants would devalue the medals and SAT scores, gay marriage would devalue marriage for all non-gay married couples. Eventually, whatever benefit man-woman couples get from marriage would be lessened.

None of this means gay marriage should be prohibited. But to pretend it would bestow only benefits and no costs is unrealistic.

Randall Hoven
Alton, Ill.

URL for this article:
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB111232239815495195,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC