omega minimo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Oct-02-05 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #43 |
44. You did a great job of summing up the concept in the previous post |
|
Edited on Sun Oct-02-05 02:08 AM by omega minimo
I don't agree and you are explaining as if I didn't understand.
"Until we find a way to deliver the message clearly and concisely our party will remain exactly where it is right now."
The Repugs don't dominate because they "deliver the message clearly and concisely" -- THEY LIE.
"DUers may understand the truth, but a shocking number of Americans only buy the spin."
Here's where "framers" set themselves up with that distancing that WILL backfire.
"Using "talking points" is merely a way of getting a group on message to advance an idea; IT DOES NOT NEED TO BE A FALSE IDEA."
This rebuttal misses the point and echoes the sameness of framing rhetoric (altho I appreciate you trying to discuss it without defensiveness). It's the DELIVERY that's false, contrived and manipulative (even if well-intentioned).
I did not say this is not a consumer driven society. Please read what I said.
:hi:
|