You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #12: I hope Democrats realize the electoral significance of Virginia in 2008 [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Awsi Dooger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
12. I hope Democrats realize the electoral significance of Virginia in 2008
If we nominate Warner, that puts Virginia in play bigtime. And if we could somehow win Virginia, that changes the entire dynamic, essentially reversing the margin for error advantage from the GOP to our side. Basically, we would no longer need either Ohio or Florida. Kerry had 252 electoral votes. Virginia has 13. The magic number is 270. Admittedly, we would have to hold all of the Kerry states, including New Hampshire which Gore lost in 2000, but if that happened and we also won Virginia, then we would require only ONE of the following: New Mexico, Iowa, Nevada, Colorado. Each of those states has at least 5 electoral votes, the magic over-the-top number.

Virginia has been trending slightly our way, but no chance we bump it over the top in 2008 minus a favorite son boost or a national mandate, which would make Virginia irrelevant anyway. Since Virginia has not been represented on a national ticket in quite a while, the favorite son boost should be considerable. Hardly surprising you have a Virginian (George Allen) as a potential nominee on each side. Here is the partisan chart, with relation to the national popular vote margin at right:

Virginia:
'88: Bush (59.74 - 39.23) = + 12.79% Republican
'92: Bush (44.97 - 40.59) = + 9.94% Republican
'96: Dole (47.10 - 45.15) = + 10.48% Republican
'00: Bush (52.47 - 44.44) = + 8.54% Republican
'04: Bush (53.68 - 45.48) = + 5.74% Republican

I'm not sure we can project that 5.74 down another 2 points, or more, by 2008. If so, we might even be able to win Virginia with Warner in the VP slot. But that's doubtful, and would obviously depend on who topped the ticket. The traits dolstein's article hinted at atop this thread are vital to winning a state like Virginia. No one is going to wheel fake the NASCAR types and pretend to fit in. I don't threaten to guess what happens if Allen becomes the GOP frontrunner at the same time we're considering Warner. You would think dualing Virginians would default to GOP advantage, given the base instincts of the state. Warner was wise to forego a senate run versus an incumbent.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC