Reply #81: Re: [View All]

[drummo]

I think this one is pretty obvious....I doubt anyone's missing the fact that he/she brings up this shit every chance they get.

No. Only when Clark is promoted as the 2008 nominee by Dems who also think voting for the IWR was a major blunder and that Hill Dems were cowards to vote for it. Clark was not less of a coward and I'm fighting against double-standard whereever I can.

And I think a lot of folks here are smart enough to see through it and to have educated themselves enough about Clark to know where he really stands.

So far none of those "smart folks" managed to come up with any evidence that Clark didn't in fact flip-flop in the IWR. None of those "smart people" could explain why Clark never denied the accuracy of those quotes.
It's not enough to say it's shit. Prove it that it's false.

I'm still trying to figure out what this one's game is exactly though

To counter the lie that Clark was against the IWR all along. It's simply not true.

He/she claimed not to know that Bush used the term "internets",

And what does that have to do with Clark and the IWR?
Guess what? I do not pay attention to every damn word Bush utters.
Nor do you, by the way. So what's your point?

which I would think anyone paying even the slightest attention during the runup to the election would have known

You can think many things. But that doesn't mean you are right.
In fact you had a very little chance to notice Bush's "internets" comment if you only payed
"the slightest attention during the runup to the election".

Yet, he/she has all of this Clark-bashing stuff easily at hand

And not only that but I also know next to nothing about prehistoric art and still I know a lot about Beethoven's symphonies. How is that possible, you wonder. Can it be that someone knows nothing about subject X while knows a lot about subject Y?

and a lot of stuff to try to make Gore look better too...It's just really really curious is all I'm sayin'.

That's because I know a lot of stuff about Gore.
What don't you understand about that, dear?