You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #90: Oh. We're citing Commondreams now. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-24-05 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #88
90. Oh. We're citing Commondreams now.
And after you made it oh so very clear that you do not regard them as a valid source to cite in these kinds of discussions. We're not having a little double standard or anything now are we?

And you can point out that it's really Adam Nagourney of the NYT as easily as I can point out that I was really citing an editorial by Molly Ivins. It still doesn't detract from the hypocrisy. To say nothing of the fact that Molly Ivins is generally regarded as far more credible than Adam Nagourney around here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC