You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary votes with Repugs, and Obama sits this one out but says he would have voted NO [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-27-07 02:03 PM
Original message
Hillary votes with Repugs, and Obama sits this one out but says he would have voted NO
Advertisements [?]
Edited on Fri Jul-27-07 02:20 PM by pirhana
Warning: This is a controversial topic

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=21688
(Yes - it is a repug website and that is why they are so happy that it didn't pass - infact that are calling the ACLU Islamic Activists)

Saving the 'John Doe' Amendment
by Ericka Andersen

Posted: 07/26/2007

Should citizens -- acting in good faith to report suspicious activity -- be subjected to lawsuits by Islamic activists? Democrats think so. Last week, they attempted to strip away the “John Doe” provision from the new Homeland Security Department legislation. For now, they have failed.

All but one Republican, presidential candidate Sen. Sam Brownback (R-Kan.), who abstained from the vote, united against removing the provision. Voters who wanted to omit the amendment included a crowd of Democrats including presidential candidate Sens. Joe Biden (D-Del.), Jim Webb (D-Va..) and Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), among others. Those who abstained, including Brownback and presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.), effectively sided with those who voted against it. Democratic presidential candidate and New York Sen. Hillary Clinton voted to keep the provision. Chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee Rep. Benny Thompson’s (D-Miss.) spokeswoman said he was concerned that the amendment could lead to racial profiling, according to a news report. But Thompson played a key role in working out the specific language of the final bill.

The Democrats who voted to strip the provision teamed up with the American Civil Liberties Union, which in November wrote a letter to Leiberman claiming that religious persecution had occurred and the clerics were “deemed a threat to security merely because they had, in accordance with their faith, conducted their evening prayers in Arabic.” The ACLU said that after 9/11, “flying while Muslim” made some passengers unfair targets. However, the imams’ behavior in the November incident provoked a real concern for air travel safety. Suspicion is a simple, preventative measure that puts citizens in control and helps security officials. If you see something, say something.
----------------

This is a tough subject.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC