You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #15: But what has he done to fight the INSTITUTION of corporate greed and malfeasance? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-05-08 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
15. But what has he done to fight the INSTITUTION of corporate greed and malfeasance?
Individual court cases are not the issue here. I am asking about what he did, legislatively, to fight corporate greed and malfeasance? The insitution of corporate greed and malfeasance.

(Citing court cases is a little bit like saying, back in the 1950s, that you had some black friends while doing nothing to oppose the institutions of racism.)

I want to know what he has done besides rhetoric?

I really want to know why, if he is so opposed to corporate malfeasance and greed, he has not taken the minimal stand even of removing his $16 million (or whatever insane amount it is) from the Fortress hedge fund .... just even as a symbolic move to protest their tax-evasion in the Cayman Islands and their role in the subprime mess? This would be an easy step for him, to put his money where his mouth is, yet I am not aware that he has removed one penny from this fund.

Just today, in the Business section of the NY Times, there was an article about the obscene compensations that hedge-fund managers received this year (we're talking billions for individuals, not millions). Why has Mr. Edwards not removed his funds from such a hedge fund in protest of such practices?

Why has he not returned the $500,000 he earned while working for Fortress? He claims not to have known they were heavily investing in subprime investments during the time he was there, which means he probably did not take the time to even look at their investments, since it was a hefty portion of their holdings. Which means he didn't earn whatever they were paying him. Which means, as an act of good faith he should return it. (It's a drop in the bucket for him anyway).

I truly am befuddled why I can't, myself, point to a single real thing John Edwards has done that would lead me to believe that he could deal with this real problem of corporate greed and malfeasance. Standing in court or on the soapbox aren't enough for me. I need to see action, and I haven't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC