Reply #12: That's fair enough as long as you are consistent with Obama [View All]

[Bread and Circus]

If you were one to express outrage at the McClurkin thing then I think the "Fellowship" might give you pause. I disapprove of Obama using any spokesperson for his campaign that is bigoted toward gays so let's get that straight. However, Clinton has kept her religious activity in the Senate with other socially conservative (and anti-gay) Senators, very hush hush. I'm trying to bring this to light in the hopes that people will come clean and be consistent in how they judge, see themselves in others, and be careful about the difference between talking about religion and it's influence on poltics and being outright hateful.

What I've been struck with by my two threads is that some of the most ardent supports of Clinton (robbedvoter et al.) have taken a very glib stance, failing to discuss or even show evidence they read the thread, and seem fairly oblivious to Clinton's religious activity.

I concede that Clinton all but has this nomination sewed up so I don't think by any means any discussion of her Senatorial religious activity will have any bearing on the nomination process going forward.

A higher level of debate is all I ask for.