Cha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Jan-24-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
15. Yeah, even the NYT who's impressed by |
|
hilary's "experience" wants her to clean up the clinton's act..
"As strongly as we back her candidacy, we urge Mrs. Clinton to take the lead in changing the tone of the campaign. It is not good for the country, the Democratic Party or for Mrs. Clinton, who is often tagged as divisive, in part because of bitter feeling about her husband’s administration and the so-called permanent campaign. (Indeed, Bill Clinton’s overheated comments are feeding those resentments, and could do long-term damage to her candidacy if he continues this way.)
Give me Obama's experience anyday..with all of hilary's so-called "experience" she didn't know enough not vote yea on bushits' IWR.
Obama with his experience in the Illinois State Senate knew enough to be against this War On Iraq from the very beginning.
And before some hilary get on and ask why "he's endorsing" it now..he's not. That's such disingenous bullshit from the hilarys. They'll all funding it so our Soldiers will have supplies until we get somone in there who will bring them home..even though bushit is trying to make it permenantly.. to feed the military complex machine.
|