You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #7: I'm sorry it wasn't for John Edwards, but that is one hell of an [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Tarheel_Dem

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Sat Jan-26-08 05:10 PM
Response to Original message

7. I'm sorry it wasn't for John Edwards, but that is one hell of an

endorsement, and an indictment of the "Clinton" years. I just don't understand why anyone, in his right mind, wants a replay of that madness. The Clintons, as the article states, are very divisive and polarizing which begs the question, how much of her agenda can she really expect to get through Congress? Because if Hillary is at the top of the ticket, I predict that everything down-ticket will suffer, and we'll be looking at another deadlocked, do-nothing Congress.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.