Reply #45: I don't get what you're driving at. Though bubbles keep getting [View All]

[peacetalksforall]

burst for me (changes and leaning of the Clintons to top the list), I think there are some things to consider:

. The words Ted Kennedy and Caroline Kennedy used to compare him to those they knew is valid in their minds. Time will tell.

. Not endorsing Hillary Clinton could make plenty of sense, to him.

. I'm not happy with Kennedy at times, but most of the time he makes my heart soar when he fights for us.

. However, though he doesn't seem to hang out with the DLC the way Bill Clinton does, I feel he is a DLC sympathizer and perhaps a very important adviser.

. Anything DLC makes me feel angry and upset because I don't think there should be any approval of any kind for killing our kids and the people of a sovereign nation or nations in a phony, Republican war supported by Democrats on behalf of corporations and barons.

. I don't track his votes and I've always wished I had, but he fights for the lives of our common citizens while I see him as not being that strong against the war - which is the DLC position.

So again, I'm never getting 100% from anyone for what I believe in - life, peace, opportunity, trading fairly, rights, votes, our original Constitution, zero executive orders. Mostly allowing people to live and thrive and reach their high and lofty potentials. Most of the time I like his votes when I know what they are.

I am thrilled when he embarrasses and exposes the crimes of the Republicans as they attempt to trick the legislation process and the are all about taking away what is ours - their voters, also. They are one evil cross to bear - and their agenda is facilitated and aided by our own and we learn every day how Nader was right .

So, I can't even begin to think of a thing that would be malevolent enough for what you are inferring.

It can't be worse than Republicanism as we know it today.