You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.

Latest

Greatest

Lobby

Journals

Options

Help

Reply #5: Voting Present on those bills was a strategy that Illinois NOW did not support." [View All]

Printer-friendly format

Email this thread to a friend

Bookmark this thread

This topic is archived.

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

robbedvoter

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Jan-31-08 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #1

5. Voting Present on those bills was a strategy that Illinois NOW did not support."

Edited on Thu Jan-31-08 02:38 PM by robbedvoter

That seems to be a reliable source to me whomever this Marsh is (is he btw a RW-er like the many you guys quote here? A Bushie?)

I thought the latest explanation was that NOW wanted him to vote present...
I know, it wasn't 130 times, it was only 129...
"I wasn't aware I voted no - let the record show I meant to vote yes"

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009)

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate

About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.