You're equating my ignoring some people at DU with George Bush's general attitude as president, right?
Okay, let's go with that for the moment.
My criteria for partially or completely ignoring certain people and/or their posts, as stated in previous posts: rude, harassing, untruthful, arrogant, unpleasant, pointlessly snarky, and without respect for others; I will at this time also add redundant and inane to the list.
~vs~
George W. Bush's criteria for ignoring anyone (i.e., generals/scientists) or anything (i.e., facts/studies), as documented historically: disagreeing with his ideés fixes.
Nope, sorry. That just doesn't work.
I believe your most recent statement is a good example of the logical fallacy known as "questionable analogy."
Either that or you're just sharpening your skills at absurd hyperbole.
Good night.