You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #99: Keep looking, and see how much of the "negativity" is fact-based. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-12-08 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
99. Keep looking, and see how much of the "negativity" is fact-based.
There are reasons to go negative against Clinton or Obama, and the number of threads devoted to the task matters not a whit. All that is important is that potential voters be made aware of as many facts as possible.

Personally, I think that Clinton's much longer record simply makes the statistics you've discovered inevitable. Obama would have to be corrupt, indeed, to have made as many missteps as she has in his few years on the national scene.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC