You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senator Clinton can NOT win the democratic nomination mathematically [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Tropics_Dude83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-15-08 10:33 PM
Original message
Senator Clinton can NOT win the democratic nomination mathematically
Advertisements [?]
I just did some number crunching for fun. According to Wikipedia, she has 984 pledged delegates right now. 2,025 are needed to win and 2,208 or so are needed counting Florida and Michigan. I had no idea she had so few pledged delegates. There are just 1,074 pledged delegates left to be won in the primaries still to come. She would need to win 1,035 to 1,040 out of 1,074 pledged delegates remaining to get to the 2,025 number. And she certainly can't seat Florida and Michigan and say "see I got to 2,025 that way" because the majority would then be 2,208.

Senator Obama has like 1121 pledged delegates.

Right now she has 233 pledged super delegates with only 333 super delegates who have not declared who they intend to vote for. So, it gets very difficult to see how she can win even in that circumstance. Best case scenario for her she gets up to like 1,900 with super delegates added.

The math just doesn't add up. Ohio, Texas and Pennsylvania don't really matter or change the mathematics much at all. However, Penn is being clever. The media has bought into Ohio and Texas being critical swing states. So, Hillary's only hope is that she has substantial victories in Ohio, Texas and PA. This would then allow her to build momentum and maybe win states that she's not supposed to like Pennsylvania. However, if Ohio and Texas are resistant to the Obama wave right now, why would North Carolina not be resistant to a HRC wave coming off of her PA win?

Furthermore, this "22 states don't matter" Penn meme makes sense now. It is ALL about the Clinton camp's pitch to the superdelegates wherein she states that since she won all of the big states that she should be the nominee.

So, in short, she doesn't have a prayer of winning based on pledged delegates. Her OH, TX and PA strategy doesn't really net her much either in that sense. She's using her big state wins to try to sway the super delegates to sway her. As I said though, even if she wins 61% of the remaining 333 superdelegates, the math still seems awfully tough for her.

Senator Obama is more likely than not going to be our nominee. Even TX, OH and PA can't save her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC