I keep reading all these silly stories... Obama's short but
pertinent record suggests exactly what he is an honest and
progressive liberal. He was a community organizer, a
COMMUNITY ORGANIZER, a grueling and thankless career choice.
His record of sponsored and co-sponsored bills in office is
pretty great; better, more liberal, more progressive, and much
longer than Hillary's. Read it. And he's been in office a
shorter time period than Hillary. What has Hillary done? I
don't get it. Look at the facts. Hillary is trying to
snowball everyone into believing she's this great candidate,
this great person. Do you remember when she had to return
hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of china she had STOLEN
from the white house. Do you remember all the corporate
scandals she and Bill were involved in? Obama's not that slick
guy, Hillary is. Marketing shouldn't be a campaign tool? What?
What the? Marketing and the political process are one and the
same these days like it or not. What the article really says
is this: Too bad Hillary and her campaign have done a
horrible job of it (marketing), too bad David Plouffe and
Barack Obama are campaign running, web building, grassroots
fund raising, buzz building geniuses, because I really like
Hillary and her campaign is horrible.