You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #8: This Democratic Race for the Nomination is marked by two worrisome characteristics... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-20-08 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. This Democratic Race for the Nomination is marked by two worrisome characteristics...
There is no doubt that McCain will be the Repub Nominee. And the Democratic Nomination 'seems' to have come down to Obama and Clinton.

So why is there not more early 'bashing' of the Democratic Candidates with 'dirt' to blunt turnout of voters in the primaries? Regardless of who becomes the nominee, the huge turnouts in the primaries and caucuses is energizing the Democratic base and in which in turn will bring those voters out in the general election.

I have believed for a long time that Republicans have been hoping to run against Clinton to energize and unite a fractured Republican base. And if that is the case there are steps they could be taking to help that happen. However I do not see that happening.

Consider this nightmare scenario: Obama appears headed toward a win at the Democratic Convention and something 'significant' in Obama's background comes to light and 'blows him out of the water.' Voila, Hillary becomes the Repub's choice Democratic Nominee AND so many new and energized voters are devastated, disgusted, and disillusioned to the extent that choose to not vote in the general election.

Maybe nothing... but it has me concerned.

I do not know much about the Judge in the Rezko fraud case. It is not surprising that 1.5 mil docs were dropped on defense counsel before trial with inadequate time to review and prepare before trial begins. However, in such a high profile case, it creates an almost automatic basis for appeal. 'Trials by ambush' are not favored by appellate courts. So why is the Judge insistent on 'pushing' this case to trial --even if the perfunctory delays have been used up by Defense Counsel? There is something significant in these docs that someone wants made public, now and not later. We will see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC